Simple question. The only 3d movie that I've went out to see was Avatar, and I did NOT like it. the 3d that is, movie was great. But I have glasses, and 3d glasses + corrective eyewear = headache
Group: Moderators
Posts: 78,042
Joined: 10-April 07
From: England
I have not seen a 3D movie yet but to me its a con to charge more so they can make more money once the technology gets cheaper. I know of 3D TV's but I doubt I would get one over a normal TV as I personally want to watch TV without having to put on glasses, that mean you have to keep taking them off everytime you leave to do something else and if they get lost the 3D TV channels/movies/games become uselss
Group: Honor Members
Posts: 34,648
Joined: 7-April 07
From: Behind a PC
It's not a con in my eyes.... but then again, I'm a big fan of visual spectacle, and I really enjoyed several 3D-movies. (Altough the only one I would really say wouldn't work without 3D is Avatar, so yeah.....)
Group: Journalists
Posts: 9,332
Joined: 22-February 09
From: Way up high
I'm indifferent. Sure, it looks cool, but really, is it worth the glasses? They're uncomfortable, and generally, you want to be comfortable. So really, no I don't think so.
3d has its place, when I say 3d I don't mean when like three things come and jump at you. movies like Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters and The Avengers are great in 3d, movies like Skyfall, animated movies and the notebook are soooo not worth it in 3d. (love James Bond movies just don't think they'd be good in 3d)
Do you like 3D?
Apr 23 2010, 08:53 PM
